what should the coach have done differently to ensure validity?
two.1.1 Scientific Research Part I
- Due Oct 16, 2019 by 11:59pm
- Points 37
- Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
- Available until Oct 18, 2019 at 11:59pm
This consignment was locked Oct 18, 2019 at 11:59pm.
Projection 2.1.ane Scientific Inquiry
Introduction
Scientific research is the systematic fashion of finding answers to testable questions and making observations for the purpose of learning new facts or testing the application of theories. Scientific research is necessary for scientific progress.
In PBS, HBS, and MI you conducted scientific research past designing and carrying out experiments to learn more almost the functioning of the human body. Through your experiments, you investigated factors that tin can impact heart rate and blood pressure level, how do affects the amount of oxygen your lungs remove from air, factors that affect muscle fatigue, and ways that biofeedback therapy tin control certain internal actual processes that normally occur involuntarily. You lot accept too seen a diversity of examples of scientific research advancing the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disease. You lot learned how emerging technologies are providing insight into the genes behind cancer and potential cancer treatments, how inserting functional genes into a person's genome may one twenty-four hour period replace faulty genes, and how tissue engineering might provide a method to grow organs for organ transplantation. Without inquiry studies, none of these advances would exist possible.
Researchers design studies to find the most accurate answer to the question they are asking. In this activity you will investigate the variety of enquiry study designs available, learn how to evaluate which design is the most advisable for the question being asked, and set up a small report pattern.
Equipment
- Computer with Cyberspace access and presentation software
Resources
- Experimental Blueprint
- Inquiry Blueprint Interactive Presentation
- Projection 2.1.1 Educatee Response Canvas
Procedure
Part I
1. Work with a partner and open the Inquiry Design interactive presentation.
two. Obtain a Student Response Canvas.
3. Complete the Research Pattern interactive presentation. Complete the graphic organizer on the Student Response Sheet as you work through the presentation. Make sure yous reply Conclusion question ane when prompted.
four. Respond Decision question two.
Decision
1. What should the omnibus have done differently to ensure validity?
2. Follow the links below to read the abstracts from two scientific journals. For each abstract depict which type of report pattern was used and explain how yous arrived at your answer.
-
- Green, R., Schneider, L., Amato, D., Beelen, A., Wilcock, Grand., Swabb, Eastward., Zavitz, Thou. (2009). Effect of Tarenflurbil on cognitive refuse and activities of daily living in patients with mild Alzheimer disease. Journal of the American Medical Association [Internet]. [cited 2009 Dec 21]; 302(23): 2557–2564. Available from http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstruse/302/23/2557
-
- Schulman, S., Kearon, C., Kakkar, A., Mismetti, P., Schellong, Southward., Eriksson, H., Bannstra, D., Schnee, J., Goldhaber, Southward. (2009). Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. New England Journal of Medicine [Cyberspace]. [cited 2009 December 21]; 361(24):2342–2352. Available from http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/361/24/2342
10/16/2019 eleven:59pm
Rubric
Find Rubric
Proceed in mind that 25 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing information technology will affect their evaluations.
You've already rated students with this rubric. Whatsoever major changes could affect their cess results.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit benchmark description Delete benchmark row Conclusion Question 1 _6763 What should the coach have washed differently to ensure validity?
threshold: pts |
| pts -- | ||||
| Edit criterion description Delete criterion row Conclusion Question 2 536_1449 Follow the links beneath to read the abstracts from 2 scientific journals. For each abstruse draw which type of study design was used and explicate how you arrived at your answer.
threshold: pts |
| pts -- | ||||
| Edit criterion description Delete criterion row Student Resource Sheet 536_5678
threshold: pts |
| pts -- | ||||
| Edit benchmark description Delete criterion row Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts |
| pts -- | ||||
| Total Points: 37 out of 37 | ||||||
Rubric
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit benchmark description Delete criterion row Description of criterion
threshold: five pts |
| pts -- | ||
| Total Points: 5 out of 5 | ||||
Source: https://deptford.instructure.com/courses/1860/assignments/1231
0 Response to "what should the coach have done differently to ensure validity?"
Publicar un comentario